How do systems that draw on databases of personal information identify and reidentify individuals as the same unique persons and differentiate them from others? What impact do these processes have on the individual, as well as on the political structures and institutional policies that shape our society? In this journal article, Jordan Brensinger and Gil Eyal develop a sociological theory of personal identification that offers scholars a framework for studying these crucial questions.
Citation
Brensinger, J., & Eyal, G. (2021). The Sociology of Personal Identification. Sociological Theory, 39(4), 265-292. https://doi.org/10.1177/07352751211055771
Abstract
Systems drawing on databases of personal information increasingly shape life experiences and outcomes across a range of settings, from consumer credit and policing to immigration, health, and employment. How do these systems identify and reidentify individuals as the same unique persons and differentiate them from others? This article advances a general sociological theory of personal identification that extends and improves earlier work by theorists like Goffman, Mauss, Foucault, and Deleuze. Drawing on examples from an original ethnographic study of identity theft and a wide range of social scientific literature, our theory treats personal identification as a historically evolving organizational practice. In doing so, it offers a shared language, a set of concepts for sensitizing researchers’ attention to important aspects of personal identification that often get overlooked while also facilitating comparisons across historical periods, cultural contexts, substantive domains, and technological mediums.
Jordan Brensinger and Gil Eyal
Project Leads
-
Jordan Brensinger
Researcher
-
Gil Eyal